Current Overview of Scientific Production Associated with Governance in University: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v21.5028Keywords:
Governance, University Institutions, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
The main objective of this research is to identify the current panorama of scientific production associated with governance in university institutions. A bibliometric analysis was developed in Scopus using R Core Team 2022-Bibliometrix and Vosviewer software. The results highlight the countries with the highest productivity in the topic of study, with the most representative authors favoring the understanding of governance. The main thematic clusters stand out. It recognizes the role of university governance and its migration to direct spaces and the transition from a face-to-face model.
References
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bleiklie, I. & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and Governance of Universities. Higher Education Policy, 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2005). Orchestrating creative minds. The governance of higher education and research in four countries compared. DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO, 02-17.
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher education, 62(4), 503-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9401-z
Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher education, 62(5), 665-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9412-4
Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802372885
Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & De Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher education, 58(5), 619-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9213-1
McCowan, T. (2016). Universities and the post-2015 development agenda: an analytical framework. Higher Education, 72(4), 505-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0035-7
Parker, L. (2011). University corporatisation: Driving redefinition. Critical perspectives on accounting, 22(4), 434-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.11.002
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Orviz Martínez, N., Cuervo Carabel, T. & Arce García, S., (2021). Review of scientific research in ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: a bibliometric analysis. Cuadernos de Gestión, 21(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191189no. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191189no. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191189no
Parker, L. D. (2002). It's been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical perspectives on accounting, 13(5-6), 603-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2002.0561
Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1-2), 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00384.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
- Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
- After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
- In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org
